Another article in the media that talks about the Sacred and Profane is 'Italy crucifix row teacher barred' (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7897802.stm)In this article a teacher has been suspended for removing a crucifix from his classroom. In Italy is the custom to display a crucifix in every building but with judges refusing to enter courts with a crucifix displayed. This gives fear that this tradition may not be a tradition for much longer. I believe that there is a sense of sacredness where religions can co-exist and show the love of their god to all and that profanity is where religions fight amongst themselves not showing any qualities that they want to be associated with. It is an outcry to think that a judge would refuse to enter a court room that has a crucifix in it and that a teacher would even go to the extent of removing one. Without a faith in these religions these symbols mean nothing which is just the same as having a statue or any other decoration. A crucifix represents a valuable story but all symbols are profane they only can become sacred if in your state of mind that you associate with the heavens (Chaos). Therefore it is right to conclude that a symbol only has the value (or sacredness) that you put on it, therefore if you don’t put value in it then what’s the need to refuse to enter a room with a decoration in it.
